Hacker News Reader

Fair enough! The simple answer is: we did a lot of work to make the model better at coding without requiring complicated installation or configuration. One comman to install and run.

All the benefits of claude code, without any of the limitations or rug pulls.

View on HN

I’m not nitpicking, but you’re saying better than Claude or Codex? Is it also focused and tested mainly on web/JS technologies? It’s still berry much uphill battle building native apps. I think there’s untapped market for Swift / Android coding models.

Actually, we're more broadly trained than most models. We did long tail training across languages, so we improved execution with languages like java, swift, and even cobol.

It's definitely a david vs goliath. But we know there's a subset of devs who need the privacy or unlimited nature of local.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com