[flagged]
Source?
1000 Ukrainians for 38 Russians. Such exchanges with similarly lopsided ratios happen every couple weeks.
That could be bullshit. But it holds water as a hypothesis. If Ukraine were suffering 20:1 casualty ratios against itself on the field, Russia would have won already. There are no weapons that can overcome a small belligerent losing more bodies than the larger one.
The fact you use this term makes it quite clear which side you’re speaking for.
It's just Ukraine. Unless you're doing this on purpose.
>>and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 people per hour
https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine
It seems to hover around 30k dead a month recently, so 1000 people a day, divided by 24, that's actually ~41 people an hour.
But you know, even if we assume these numbers are wildly innacurate and only half those given...that's still 20 per hour?
>>X and Telegram channels are full of videos of freshly dug graves in The Ukraine.
No doubt, but what does that have to do with anything.
>>Edit: since Hypocrisy News is rate limiting me I can't reply to the redditor asking for a source:
So on one hand you call BBC a highly biased source, and then you link an article from it? So which one is it? Is it biased, or is it the source of your information?
Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring - poor choice of words but meh - Russia.
Let that sink in. The real ratio must be much higher.
How can you make such a confident assumption? Like I said in another comment - it could be simply that Russians are being killed in places where Ukrainians can't or won't retrieve their bodies from. As Russians are the aggressors and moving into Ukrainian territory, this seems almost expected?
>>Even a highly biased source like the BBC admits to a highly skewed KIA ratio favouring Russia
Except they aren't doing that at all, because unlike you, they aren't equating bodies traded with KIA ratios. Maybe nuance isn't my forte, but then again, I'm not sure what yours is.