Hacker News Reader

Comment by praptak | Hacker News Reader

Oil is still underpriced wrt to its environmental cost. It is good to see at least the political cost being accounted for.

View on HN

From my point of view, this incredibly stupid war has only positive externalities. The costs of oil are legion and unaccounted.

> Oil is still underpriced wrt to its environmental cost.

This may well be true, but we still haven't found a better fuel. Sure, we have electric cars, but they are still too expensive for the masses, or impractical, e.g. for apartment dwellers. Besides, oil has countless other uses besides as fuel for vehicles.

Yes, and, the world would be better off if the price of oil were higher. We would produce less plastic crap and take fewer frivolous airplane trips and take more public transit. Our petroleum consumption is based on underpriced oil.

There's no incentive to find a better fuel as long as the price of oil doesn't have the externalities priced in.

> but we still haven't found a better fuel

We have. It's electric.

What runs the power plants? Steam?

China makes them cheaply enough.

Software-on-wheels under the control of a foreign nation, what could go wrong?

This could be an argument for investing in more reliable/higher capacity public transit systems though. Which would also likely result in a fair increase in public health from moving a bit more and possibly less polluted air going in an out of the lungs of the populace.

> This could be an argument for investing in more reliable/higher capacity public transit systems though.

Public transit is impractical outside of big urban centers. And even there, it's nearly always a nasty experience. This is why people who can afford it still drive or use taxis in cities.

I take it you haven't lived in a country that invests significantly in its public transportation infrastructure, like Switzerland or Japan?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com