> so much so that there's a wikipedia page dedicated to the falsehoods
Not detracting from the merits of your statement, but Wikipedia is not neutral, it is biased politically/ideologically, so it should not be used as a fair "measure" of things.
Not detracting from the merits of your statement, but Wikipedia is not neutral, it is biased politically/ideologically, so it should not be used as a fair "measure" of things.
With respect to ideological bias, I strongly doubt that other Presidents never made "false or misleading statements" but I can't seem to find, for example, the page of "False or misleading statements made by Joe Biden". It seems a stretch to say he made none, to the point one might wonder about the discrepancy.
Why is there no wikipedia page about basketball points scored by Lionel Messi?
I bet he made some in his life?
Calling it biased/ideological is a recent trend pushed by certain billionaires who didn't like their DOGE corruption being exposed.