Hacker News Reader

Comment by closeparen | Hacker News Reader

There is no world where a totalitarian government’s law enforcement ambitions on some object-level question are thwarted by the same government’s enforcement of privacy law. Countries with GDPR that are thinking of rounding up and kicking out the refugees know perfectly well who and where the refugees are.

View on HN

The law is irrelevant in that case but the actual situation is not. If people have never put their personal information online, the bad government can't get it from online. A new phone coming out during the time of the bad government, that says the government requires you to enter your name and address, will not be received as well as if it comes out during good government times.

> will not be received as well as if it comes out during good government times.

What bearing does that have on anything.

Making the point that people tend to engage in short term thinking. The reception of the same law, product, or practice will be colored by the current government as opposed to potential future ones.

You're not entirely wrong; ultimately if they put enough resources towards it they can probably catch quite a number of people. But governments have limited resources and really don't track everyone all the time. Not even in 2026 are they able to do that yet. It helps if you maintain some level of opsec. If they really want to get you, they can get close, but see eg Ed Snowden; who managed to stay ahead of the US government just long enough to reach relative safety (FSVO).

Snowden’s experience doesn’t generalise to, well, anyone really.

Well, I wouldn't personally recommend single-handedly taking on the most powerful nation on earth, myself.

But turns out that if your opsec is decent, and even using mostly publicly available tools like Snowden did, you might survive even that.

In the nuanced case, normal people applying more normal opsec can handle more normal things, would seem to follow.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com