What do you mean by “scientific”? These concepts aren’t discoverable in nature. However, they’re transparently defined in the code book and the “opinions” are available for analysis in the expert coder-level dataset.

It’s a well known benchmark in comparative political science with a specific rubric for how each category is analyzed. It’s imperfect but far more rigorous than dismissing indicators of backsliding as just “not liking Trump” (just one of many examples that together form a concerning trend):

F.C.C. Chair Threatens to Revoke Broadcasters’ Licenses Over War Coverage

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/14/world/middleeast/fcc-broa...

FCC boss vows to ‘rebalance’ media, urges more pro-America programming

https://www.foxnews.com/media/fcc-boss-vows-rebalance-media-...

Linberg's assumptions are fake. Just look at Germany silencing free speech, and the whole of the EU attempting to control free speech in the digital realm, which the US has.

Has this elected person said or done anything that specifically endangers voting rights? Or, say, federalizes voting?

What if the things I don't like are anti-democratic? Like masked agents without warrants dragging people out of their homes and cars while ignoring federal court orders about using tear gas and other tactics? Or starting a war in the Middle East without consulting Congress and the American people.