I think this kind of argument is a modified version of an ad-hominem attack.
When you disagree with an argument, you are supposed to address the argument itself, not the thing making the argument.
When you disagree with an argument, you are supposed to address the argument itself, not the thing making the argument.
So, no, you are making the claim, first prove it is worth any of that effort.
If you prompted an LLM to make a PSA that people should brush their teeth, is it a fair to argue that brushing your teeth is bad because an LLM made the argument?
A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has.
Example usage:
“That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”
So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.
Ad hominllm: the dismissal of a work or an argument because an LLM was, or may have been, used in its construction or editing.