https://github.com/righttoprivacyact/bill/tree/main/tests
There’s clearly a non-trivial level of LLM involvement.
I want to say 100% lawslop. I can’t figure out who’s behind this to ascertain their qualifications and acumen in the space.
100% seems like a safe place to start speculating from but I can be talked down.
When you disagree with an argument, you are supposed to address the argument itself, not the thing making the argument.
So, no, you are making the claim, first prove it is worth any of that effort.
If you prompted an LLM to make a PSA that people should brush their teeth, is it a fair to argue that brushing your teeth is bad because an LLM made the argument?
A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has.
Example usage:
“That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”
So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.
Ad hominllm: the dismissal of a work or an argument because an LLM was, or may have been, used in its construction or editing.
Biblical times.
(a) In general.—There are authorizedI could also ask my 5 year old to draw a bill for me, that's as successful as giving a generic bill.
It depends entirely on how you prompt them.