Hacker News Reader

Comment by havenbarnes | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

No, not dozens of Innocents. About 1500, which is a lot more.

You should read the comment that you replied to again. You're railing against a fact, not an opinion.

People don't think anymore, they just react... Im pretty sure Im done engaging on this platform for that reason. Nearly every comment is met by some crass remark that clearly demonstrates the person didn't actually understand the comment, just reacted to the trigger words within it.

This is best exemplified by all the comments (on varying posts) saying: 'I misread the title, and interpreted as X, haha!'. HN has unfortunately slid in the direction of Reddit (despite the HN Guidelines' denial of this).

It always has been.

I figured my wording was clearly sarcastic but I should’ve added a “/s”. Extrajudicial slaughtering is not something I’d support regardless of civilian casualty rate.

Oh right the sarcasm and the histrionics. Yeah, that makes you sound like a petulant child that should not be taken seriously.

Do you need any more feedback about your comment or are we done?

They mean the 5% of 1250 killed by drones

We know what he meant, and he's being obtuse. Thinks thousands of deaths due to rampant crime somehow aren't or shouldn't be part of the discussion when the collateral cost of law enforcement efforts are discussed. Very dumb.

I figured my wording was clearly sarcastic but I should’ve added a “/s”. Extrajudicial slaughtering is not something I’d support regardless of civilian casualty rate.

Spamming the same comment over and over again, what a sad existence.

Flagged. Honestly, you do not belong in this platform. You have the maturity of a 3rd grader.

Personal attacks also do not belong on this platform. Regardless of what you think of the GP's comments, don't reply like this.

Neither mikkupikku nor ghurtado seem to care.

That where only the collaterals of the drone strikes. More people are killed with at least 17% innocent civilians

This is apparently a RW projection zone. You won't get anywhere with these people.

Dozens of innocents (5% of 1250 = 63) killed "extrajudicially" (i.e., illegally) by the drones that are the subject of the article, and those deaths were dismissed by the rationalization in the comment they replied to.

If you can't handle additional context being brought to the conversation, maybe its best for you to duck out.

So much projection here from RWers, as usual. I will bow out of this, due to the massive levels of intellectual dishonesty and bad faith.

"if you can't handle being an adult you should leave"

"I shall leave"

"Everybody who disagrees with me is le Nazi!"

Get a grip.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com