Has anyone done any performance testing on this yet? Just curious if the new bitmap GC is more efficient with memory and also if 2.0 is faster as it was promised.
| mem | time |
p1 | -24% | -3% |
p2 | -8% | -12% |
p3 | -31% | -12% |
avg | -21% | -9% |
Those are a couple workers I fired up for an hour. p2 relies on a C library, which might account for the smaller drop in memory usage. CPU needs investigation.
The numbers are kinda useless, but look good anyway.