> Yeah it's weird, there was one case where I thought it was AI but wasn't sure. Several other comments pointed it out, too. Author claimed he wrote it manually. (Which is honestly even more concerning!)

I find the above comment concerning, so I ask: to what degree is the above commenter calibrated to ground truth? How would they know? How would we know?

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calibrated_probability_assessm...

It seems to me comments like the above are overconfident in the worst ways.