Your link actually says they were contributing to the defense not the attack
> The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate.
> The US-Israeli strikes were launched after negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear programme ended without a deal. The UK did not participate.
The negotiations didn't end without a deal, they were ongoing but not finalized. The next session of the negotiations was scheduled for Monday. And then, Israel and US simply attacked on Saturday.
It is very important to use precise language so as to not downplay the illegal aggression against Iran.
In any case a contrarian opinion might be that Iran promised to yield on negotiations following the previous war as mentioned here:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/iran-asks-gulf-ara...
And Iran instead opted for their years old tactic of stalling the negotiations
That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century
How evil of them to do that. They should have known only the United States of America has the divine right to invade countries and extract their resources. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4grxzxjjd8o
> That's called Imperialism and was common among european powers in the 19th century
Fortunately, the USA does not want to revive such practices, as they indicated in this speech: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marco-rubio-munich-t...
Yes, OP was already saying Iran is free to act because the US is an imperial power. I was merely stating that he is conveniently ignoring Iran's imperialist behavior