So, they still choose to do it, right?
> As for Hamas
How Israelis refusal to admit these officials to meet Hamas’s leadership makes the crimes committed by Hamas not true?
So, they still choose to do it, right?
> As for Hamas
How Israelis refusal to admit these officials to meet Hamas’s leadership makes the crimes committed by Hamas not true?
This discussion started with you saying how bad Hamas was for executing Fatah collaborators in 2007 so not sure what point you are making other than agreeing with Hamas.
> How Israelis refusal to admit these officials to meet Hamas’s leadership makes the crimes committed by Hamas not true?
Inviting Humans Rights Watch does not seem like the behavior of an organization that has crimes to hide. Considering it was not possible to enter Gaza, the fact finding was limited and so it is not conclusive.
Also Humans Rights Watch had to criticize "both sides" because of political pressure. It is a move to seem impartial.
Hamas does not oppress its people. It couldn't survive a day without the support of its people. It kills collaborators as any resistance movement needs to do. Nothing wrong with that.
Here you go, they have their own category of atrocities in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hamas_attacks
It is telling that people here discuss how the protestors in Iran are justified in using violence but Palestinians are not allowed to resist foreign occupation. Suddenly that is really bad.
Resistance is not a crime.
It actually is when the “resistance” is targeting civilians, including the foreign ones.
Of course not, and the report is made up.