> The Federal government is enforcing long-standing statutes.
You forgot the very important word "selectively". They are selectively enforcing long-standing statutes, which is probably illegal and is 100% obvious corruption.
To my friends, everything; to my enemies, the law.
For my entire life I've never seen the feds do anything other than selective enforcement. See the latest disclosures RE: Zorro ranch and little saint James as recent examples.
Convenient that since January 21, 2026 late night talk shows are no longer part of the "bona fide news interview exemption", thanks to the FCC who now has a new role as the censor of political speech. Enjoy your earned freedom of speech :)
Selective enforcement is a well-known tactic on the dive to authoritarianism.
Sorry you aren't aware of that but I suggest you look into how it works.
Oh no! The Federal government is targeting their political opponents with selective enforcement of long-standing statutes.
This is just not accurate. Privious to this censorship-push since 1983 there had been a carve out for talks shows and it correspondly has not been enforced since the Regan administration. If it was, Fox News would be in violation 24/7.
Fox News doesn't use public airwaves as I understand it.
Two relevant things: 1. Fox news has a whole network of affiliates who do broadcast. 2. the FCC regulates cable, satillite, telephony and internet in addition to broadcast.
Statutes which are widely believed to be unconstitutional.
Have you ever turned on an AM radio? Good luck finding the equal opportunities provision enforced there.
Are we at a point where "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" is now considered a good thing?