It's frustrating how often 'journalism' assumes good faith and uses the language and arguments of corporations.
Rather than "fleeing age-verification" myself, and I largely assume others, are "fleeing surveillance state data harvesting".
Rather than "fleeing age-verification" myself, and I largely assume others, are "fleeing surveillance state data harvesting".
This is an extremely rational position.
Which would seem to be a failure to "report the facts".
Everyone involved knows why there is a backlash to this new policy so I advocate to stop obfuscating it.