I know the potential for bad actors here, but there is legitimate use of these services.
I used to work in the “brand protection” space. Our entire business model was SOC-aaS, scraping, verifying, and ending lookalike sites among other threats. If you’ve banked at Wells Fargo or had an iCloud account, our job was to try and make that a little bit safer.
Fact is the enemy gets a vote and quite many so-called threat actors are buying very capable kits that know what the fingerprint of a clean room virtual instance or VPN looks like.
Is it even possible for a prosumer home router like OPNsense or OpenWRT to detect this?
How many prosumers or otherwise network admins filter outbound traffic though? And of the select few that do—how many are actually 'inspecting' say, outbound TCP/443 (e.g., monitoring traffic volume, looking up destination addresses, and/or inspecting SNIs) for example?
I wish in 2026 the default on new computers (Windows + Mac) was not only "inbound firewall on by default" but also outbound and users having to manually select what is allowed.
I know it is possible, it's just not the default and more of a "power user" thing at the moment. You have to know about it basically.
It doesn't make sense to expect the companies promoting Windows or MacOS to allow the user to potentially interfere with their "services" and surveillance business model
Windows and MacOS both "phone home" (unfiltered outgoing connections). If computer owners running these corporate OS were given an easy way to stop this, then it stands to reason that owners would stop the connections back to the mothership. That means loss of surveillance potential and lost revenue
As of 2006, still nothing stops anyone from setting the gateway of their computer running a corporate OS to point to a computer running a non-corporate OS that can do the outbound filtering