The mechanics of the cancellation by the guilt of association should be reconsidered. The focus needs to be on the ones who are accused of crimes or accused of obstructing justice at the justice system level which enabled this to continue for so many years. It may be another unpopular opinion but I also think more focus should be on his execution. There is enough circumstantial evidence to support the idea that he was given a summary execution. After all, any scientist who took money or was targeted by his network was only able to do that because he was not kept in prison. The lack of a trial, the questionable death of the main defendant, all of it creates an atmosphere of secrecy which enables the redactions on files released publicly to become sort of weaponized. The focus is kept everywhere but the people named most often or the redacted names who should be held accountable and face due process without being summarily executed.