[flagged]
- There is no "your"
- There is no "you"
- There is no "talk" (let alone "talk down")
- There is no "speak"
- There is no "disrespectfully"
- There is no human.
Treat it just like you would someone running a script to spam your comments with garbage.
Moreover, by being rude, you're going to become angry and irritable yourself. To me, being rude is very unpleasant, I generally avoid being rude.
To me, this seems like a dangerous belief to hold.
Within the domain of social interaction, you are committing to making Type II errors (False negatives), and divergent training for the different scenarios.
It's a choice! But the price of a false negative (treating a human or sufficeintly advanced agent badly) probably outweighs the cumulative advantages (if any) . Can you say what the advantages might even be?
Meanwhile, I think the frugal choice is to have unified training and accept Type I errors instead (False Positives). Now you only need to learn one type of behaviour, and the consequence of making an error is mostly mild embarrassment, if even that.
I want a world in which AI users need to stay in the closet.
AI users should fear shame.
> AI users should fear shame.
> created: 3 days ago
Unsolicited advice: stop trolling and see a therapist.
If a person writes code that is disruptive, do you emphasise with the code?
The hammer had no intention to harm you, there's no need to seek vengeance against it, or disrespect it
Ehm.
Yes if the hammer is designed with A(G)I
All hail our A(G)I overlords
There is no human here. There is a computer program burning fossil fuels. What "emulates" empathy is simply lying to yourself about reality.
"treating an 'ai' with empathy" and "talking down to them" are both amoral. Do as you wish.