> You're forgetting all the times the US failed too, and those cases weren't even on its own border.
Doesn't the US have more resources at home, not less?
Wouldn't a strike on US soil be a larger escalation and dictate a swift and larger response?
Doesn't the US have more resources at home, not less?
Wouldn't a strike on US soil be a larger escalation and dictate a swift and larger response?
I believe it's unrealistic that "the cartel" would strike back against the USG, particularly on US soil.