This might sound crazy, but what if everyone in the country gave extra and as a result everyone in the country was covered?
1) We should do whatever it takes to take care of each other no matter the cost, equality
2) The actual details on how to do that for every person in every dimension is not affordable, meaning decisions have to be made to violate rule #1
So now we are back to politics and deciding which ones are more fair than others.
So writing your sentence maybe true, but it's actually naive at the same time to think it can be done in every situation.
The question is, where do we fall on that gradient?
There's nothing wrong with taking care of others, but there has to be limits. Hopefully the limits are designed in ways that encourage objectively good choices and discourage objectively bad ones.
... which is not truly separate from the society in which you live.
If life sucks for your countrymen, then you (not! the royal-you, I mean you: bluGill) will inevitably be stuck dealing with the consequences.
Neighborhoods & communities atomize. Crime increases. Fascism creeps in. The list goes on.