I will say that this experiment only exposed the plot of land to radiation, not contaminated it. Unless the source was broken or eroded, there would be no detectable radiation on that land once the source is sealed up.
That's not to say BNL hasn't contaminated the land, it is a Superfund site. They do a lot of medical experiments there (they invented the PET scan) but medical waste hasn't always been disposed of properly like now. They had "glass holes", a hole in the ground where you'd chuck in your contaminated labware.
Doing this next to an aquifer was reckless. But doing it at all is just science.
> I grew up on Long Island and I expect that it will eventually kill me
Wouldn't we expect to have solid data on this by now?
Also, "Caesium-137 has a half-life of about 30.04 years" [1]. Less than a quarter of the original sample is still Cs-137. (The rest is mostly naturally-occuring barium.)
This was mentioned in one of the articles you linked!
Are you also proposing that this was the only experiment that released radionuclides into the environment at BNL? I certainly remember the furor of them getting caught pissing tritium into the groundwater. I am sure there are many, many things they did which were not detected.
https://www.gao.gov/products/rced-98-26
It is well know and well documented that the defense industry has taken a cavalier approach to public nuclear safety from it’s very inception. And make no mistake, BNL exists primarily as a national defense asset.
These radiation sources are usually very solid metal containers with their lids welded permanently shut.
Not to mention that these sources usually contain water-soluble salts of caesium. Hence, hermetically sealing the sources is essential, especially for outdoors use.
Here's what it looked like back in 1967... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsuiLxcDuHY&t=925s