Hacker News Reader

Comment by saubeidl | Hacker News Reader

If you look closely, putting the Jews in camps will make the life of Germans better! you just need to consume other media channels.

View on HN

If you look closely, Jews were citizens and an ethnic group. Jews also somehow weren't able protest along with the enemy while whistling.

An anti-Bloomberg headline might run like this: Bloomberg wants detention centers for illegals to be without a roof. I.e, of course the deportation process continues, real estate is needed.

Jews were not citizens. That's the oldest trick in the book, make up some dumb legalistic excuse for ones crimes against humanity.

Just gate citizenship to the lilliest of whites and then put non-citizens in camps...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws#Classifications...

Jews were stripped of citizenship after 1933, so in fact they were. Quite similar to how citizens of US have European, African, etc. heritage but are still citizens.

The stripping of citizenship was implemented as prerequisite for the camps.

You need a plausible excuse for the camps after all, as I'm sure you're well aware.

Sure. I'm simply saying that illegals in the US and German Jews aren't the same. The latter actually were citizens, most/many of them for more than one generation while the illegals in the US have recently entered. Also, US illegals are simply deported, not killed.

Also, acquiring real estate for any org to for any activity is also normal. E.g a town government who buys a warehouse to house a temporary school or hospital.

Bloomberg is just trying to insinuate analogies here because their political party didn't win.

Protest along with the "enemy"? What "enemy"? You seem extremely confused to the point of not even making sense anymore.

Well, the "enemy" of the protesters are the ICE officers. When drawing Nazi Germany comparisons I was pointing out that during those times people weren't whistling along German soldiers when they didn't agree to what they were doing.

Protest "along" is a strange word then. But the main question has always been prove illegality and come with actual legal warrants and don't commit terrorist acts on random civilians, if ICE were merely following the law the protests would have been much smaller.

What's the relevance of whistling? It's not clear if it's illegal, warning motorists about speed ticketing cops is legal for example.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com