None of those three cases have to do with bribery, at least not receiving bribes for official action. Here's some nuance: Kelly concerns retaliation, McDonnell concerns whether hosting meetings and events amounts to official action, and FEC concern the limit (was $250,000) on the amount of post-election contributions which may be used to repay campaign debts.

It's also worth noting that Kelly was unanimous and FEC upheld the ruling of the district court which the FEC had appealed.

Newsom is starting to get it. But it's lividly clear that a straight shot to the Democratic Presidential nomination, and probably the White House, is embracing the new Presidential powers Trump and the Roberts Court have spun up to pursue Democratic policy goals and retribution against MAGA's least popular.