I agree with everything you say. But wow, does that comment sound like AI. Probably Grok?
Not saying you are AI, you might just be a heavy user who picked up the same patterns
Not saying you are AI, you might just be a heavy user who picked up the same patterns
It's more surprising to me that it seems to have already fooled a bunch of people looking at their replies to you.
EDIT to expand the evidence: It's placing unnecessary emphasis on a one off mention in the article (differential fuzzing) and then writes a bunch of bullshit around what it thinks it means (it's wrong, differential fuzzing isn't running them both in parallel during a transition, it's a testing methodology based on inputs/outputs).