having a gun = intent to interfere?
Interesting. Does having intent to interfere deserve execution?
Oh edit to add: did he interfere? And if so how?
Interesting. Does having intent to interfere deserve execution?
Oh edit to add: did he interfere? And if so how?
Ah so all you have to do is define your unconstitutional actions as “law enforcement operations” and suddenly we can start throwing away amendments. The founding fathers hate this one trick!
> He was there to create chaos in order to interfere with law enforcement. I don't think anyone denies this.
I deny this vehemently, mostly under the definitions of “chaos” and “law enforcement”. I do not view outcomes of civil disobedience as “chaos”, and I do not view the actions of ICE in Minneapolis as “law enforcement”.
Final edit: your painting of the victim in such a negative light, despite knowing so little about him, is morally repugnant. Observe yourself. “Look for the helpers” - Mr Rogers. Should everyone present at these protests be assumed to be subject to summary execution, no matter their intent? If you’re American, I’m ashamed to be in the same country as you.
Even the phrasing of “arresting criminal aliens” is barbaric lol. I can’t imagine hosting you in polite conversation. You’d be quietly drinking your morning coffee after Kristallnacht saying “well, it’s for the best [slurp]”.
You, ljsprague, believe Alex Pretti was executed for committing an offense.
Do you dispute this?
You calling it an "execution" is dishonest.
Only when you're called out, do you mention self defense. Glad to see you have shame. Bye.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/video-appears-show-alex-pretti-sp...
I hope you don't think that, that would be honestly disgusting. I'd strongly disagree with your stance for vigilantism and against law-and-order.
Or was he killed in self defense? And if so, why would the ICE agents be in fear for their life? I didn't see a reason myself but I want to know your perspective. Was there something in the video?