opens blog post
sees lunduke
closes blog post
sees lunduke
closes blog post
Skilled enough but the main use is as a news resource like this. The guy ion the blog would not have found out about this unless Lunduke posted about it.
Do you understand? :)
There's a real mean spirit in open source lately and a lot of it seems to revolve around political views. There's become this idea that if you and I disagree on politics then it would be impossible for us to write quality software together. It's damaged a lot of good will and cohesion that used to exist within the open source software community.
This used to be about making free software to people so that they weren't abused by corporations. Now it's about pushing agendas and creating exclusion criteria. There's only one group in this scenario that benefits from this outcome.
If you don't like Lunduke then you should recognize the factors that give rise to people like him. Unless your solution is to completely eliminate anyone who disagrees with you then your apparent mindset only furthers the problem.
I wish we could put all this aside and just enjoy open source again.
If someone disagrees with me on tax, foreign relations, government services, defense, etc policy, sure, we can disagree and still work together.
What gives rise to people like Lunduke is not a simple thing, and something I don't think society fully understands.
(And maybe it's true that those on opposite sides cannot work together on good software, but that's easily addressed since all FLOSS licenses include the right to fork and merge changes.)
Lunduke spreads misinformation. That's anti Open Source, anti community.
He doesn't. He just reports events as a journalist. He doesn't fight against open source.
Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype. His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
You've just confirmed obvious. No way to improve security without breaking changes. And you demand mostly nontechnical users to blacklist applications. That's a recipe for disaster.
Namespaces. It's been done already. Look into XLibre.
>Lunduke made factually wrong claims for hype.
Citation needed.
>His mob are keen to attack Open Source developers.
Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
> Doesn't own a mob, and never happened. Horrible accusation, by the way.
Mob unable to response on technical question. To use logic.
> Citation needed.
His YouTube comment section speaks volumes. He manipulates technically uneducated.
Ah, the classic moving of goalposts.
I'll bite: It is far from impossible, and already solved elsewhere: Most applications do not need such functionality.
For those that do, provide mechanisms to request and facilitate access to such functionality when needed. Like portals do for other functionality. And a wrapper to request automatically for e.g. old binaries without source.
> (further slander on Lunduke and community)
Uncool.
He has made funny videos, it was fun to watch. Its kinda hard to enjoy them now after learning he s dumb as a rock and justifies killings if you are of tje wrong nationality
Is he ""bigoted"" ? :(
How do I know? As a FOSS developer myself with a decade plus public history I also happen to know a few people running prominent FOSS projects.
He's burned bridges for no good reason. He doesn't care.
* Devuan: The Non-Woke Debian Linux Fork (Without Systemd)
* NeoFetch But in Rust and More Gay
* Chimera Linux is "Here to Further Woke Agenda by Turning Free Software Gay"
* Are Jews the Cause of DEI in Big Tech?
Yeah .. I did not watch a single video of his. But just from a short few seconds It's not anything I want to invest time in to see if he has a point or not. Life is too short.
FWIW, probably not much, he said he had a Jewish background ... in, like, the one video I watched and eventually gave up on.
Something changed in the 2014ish time-frame when it got more and more politically extreme.
...errrrrrrrrrrrrr, plot twist, he is a jew himself, or at least he claimed he is.
apt-install --fuck-yes gay-rust-neofetch
I’ll look to migrate to chimera shortly, but only if it includes gay neofetch.
The best thing to do with people like Lunduke is ignore them.
It's always horrible when your niche get poisoned by this rhetoric.
There are many people in and around tech that disagree with the direction. They want to pushing back against mega corporations, government surveillance etc. They see CoC, Woke as part of that corporate/government apparatus.
You can watch someone like Sam Bent's or Mental Outlaws YouTube channel and you will start to understand that attitude.
> It's always horrible when your niche get poisoned by this rhetoric.
Tech like a lot of areas of life has been hyper politicised. The best thing you can do is not to play the game at all.
e.g. I remember he once claimed Google was censoring him when he was de-listed from search, this was way back in 2009. His site had a malicious iframe because the PHP CMS he was using had been compromised.
His politics are kinda irrelevant to me. There are people who are Agorist/Libertarian/Conservative tech influencers online that do decent and informative content e.g. Sam Bent.
And somehow you care so much you've created this account just to attack him.
I'd suggest going out for a walk.
The fact is that hasn't actually given much to the community and has been a drama, pretty much since his appearance in Linux land. People used to dislike him then and wanted him gone and this was well before the current culture war nonsense that is often seen on YouTube, Twitter and backwaters like Rumble.
> I'd suggest going out for a walk.
I go out for an hour walk in the countryside every lunch time. I am not sure what my exercise routine has got to do with criticising a long time troll and grifter.