Hacker News Reader

Comment by negzero7 | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

Do you have a better link that can help people understand the gist of his political opinions that isn't Wikipedia?

People are downvoting this as a knee-jerk reaction, but that page actually does a way better job of explaining the issues.

Maybe you could share some of his well-reasoned positions with us, then? :)

Well I'm certainly not going to spend thousands of hours listening to his talking to decide how to feel about his thoughts and opinions.

That's fair, but also maybe don't base an opinion on 4 paragraphs from wikipedia on topics obviously nuanced.

I would imagine whoever wrote those 4 paragraphs has researched a lot more than I did about his political views. If someone with better sources went there and corrected any mistakes made previously, with referenced demonstrating it, the article would be much improved.

> I would imagine whoever wrote those 4 paragraphs has researched a lot more than I did about his political views

We all have imagined that. But taking a look at the sources in Wikipedia articles becomes ... interesting.

If you have better sources, then please, improve the article.

What should I base it on? You?

You don't need to have an opinion on everything. Clearly you don't care about this or you would spend the time watching some of his videos or reading his articles that expound on his "controversial" statements. It's ok to just say "I don't know" rather than thinking you're well informed because Wikipedia says so.

negzero7: Please explain how exactly "Blacks are a hate group" and "White people should stay the hell away from Black people" are well reasoned opinions without revealing that you're a bigoted racist sack of shit too.

It proves you're an intellectually dishonest troll when you have to attack wikipedia, while the actual thing that proves Adams was a bigoted racist sack of shit are HIS OWN WORDS, which you can not contest. And that makes you a bigoted racist sack of shit too, for attempting and spectacularly failing at such a dishonest reality denying argument.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com