> the risk of being rejected entirely
I would have phrased it the hope of being rejected entirely, but to each his own I guess.
I would have phrased it the hope of being rejected entirely, but to each his own I guess.
If my logic is just another hallucination, then I agree—it deserves to be rejected entirely. I have no interest in contributing to the 'AI-generated debris' either.
But that’s exactly why I’m here. I’m betting that the 'State Discrepancy' metric and the JTP hold up under actual scrutiny. If you find they don't, then by all means, fulfill your 'hope' and tear the paper down. I'd rather be rejected for a flawed idea than ignored for a fake one."