Another one: ask a person to say 'silk' 5 times, then ask them what cows drink.
Exploiting such quirks only tells you that you can trick people, not what their capabilities are.
Another one: ask a person to say 'silk' 5 times, then ask them what cows drink.
Exploiting such quirks only tells you that you can trick people, not what their capabilities are.
This poses a problem for new frameworks/languages/whatever that do things in a wholly different way since we'll be forced to rely on context that will contradict the training data that's available.
If you had someone familiar with every computer science concept, every textbook, every paper, etc. up to say 2010 (or even 2000 or earlier), along with deep experience using dozens of programming languages, and you sat them down to look at a codebase, what could you put in front of them that they couldn't describe to you with words they already know?
You started with 'they can't understand anything new' and then followed it up with 'because I can trick it with logic problems' which doesn't prove that.
Have you even tried doing what you say won't work?