The better path on Linux was always AMD, and still is, to this day, since it simply works without me needing to care about driver versions, or open vs closed source, at all.
The better path on Linux was always AMD, and still is, to this day, since it simply works without me needing to care about driver versions, or open vs closed source, at all.
Source: Was burned many times by ATI's promises to deliver functioning software over the years. Been using Nvidia on Linux and Freebsd for as long as can recall now.
Currently dual 3090s in this box and nvidia is still as simple as just installing the distro package.
There was a period in the mid 2010s where trying to get better battery life on laptops by optionally using the discrete gpu vs the integrated was a real pain (bumblebee/optirun were not so solid), but generally speaking for desktop machines that need GPU support... Nvidia was the route.
Don't love their company politics so much, although I think they're finally getting on board now that so many companies want to run GPU accelerated workloads on linux hosts for LLMs.
But ATI sucked. They seem to have finally gotten there, but they were absolutely not the best choice for a long time.
Hell - I still have a machine in my basement running a GTX970 from 2015, and it also works fine on modern linux. It currently does the gpu accel for whisper speech to text for HA.
When AMD bought ATI they started work on the open source drivers and improved the situation, but they had already lost me as a GPU customer by that point.
Maybe now in the 2020s AMD has caught up, and I'll keep them in mind next time I buy a GPU, but I've been happy with NVidia for a long time.
It would be nice if the NVidia driver were in the kernel and open source, but the Debian package has just worked for a very long time now.
Viewed from the Other Side, I'm far more inclined to think that NVidia actually knows what they are doing and the authors of Wayland do not.