Hacker News Reader

Comment by steeve | Hacker News Reader

[flagged]

You and OP both work for the same "High Performance AI Inference" company, you might want to disclose that.

EDIT: and while you're at it, you might also want to work on your attitude. "you idiot", "get lost" and "you need to touch grass" are not helping any HN discussions

sure, i hereby disclose that he left in September

i already said in another reply that i knew him personally

Well, in that case I'm curious... Why did you think hijacking OP's stance of "Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code" with your own opposing position of "the project itself is not AI", and getting quite offensive about it, would benefit any discussion about this 13h old project?

It's a personal project of your dear ex-colleague, mind you!

because he was been sending me updates about it for the last two weeks

because we've been discussing architecture, optimisations and benchmarks

because it's not a 13h old project

Sure, the author just happened to one-shot a project and a landing page on new year's eve. And their writing style is just coincidentally very similar to Claude's.

Who's going to buy that?

The repo being a single commit doesn't mean it's AI. It is quite common to first develop on a private repo and then clean up the commit history for the first public release.

Its an extract of two weeks of work. And yes Claude did the website and rewrote my code that was absolutely without comments and a gigantic mess. It's an extract of the fourth attempt actually. Src4/ was the original folder. But my goal my to test the architecture applied to nats not to say I've done it without ai?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com