Millions—if not billions—of dollars are likely to be wasted on this over the coming years.
Millions—if not billions—of dollars are likely to be wasted on this over the coming years.
I suspect that the "ball room" attachment to the White House will also still be a hole by the end of the administration, but a lot of money will get handed out.
"Spending billions" is meaningless concern until you ask the question: what would these people have been doing instead?
The "spent billions" isn't about me/my constituents/the US not having those billions. It's that those billions where finely calculated by (supposed) experts to help maintain PPP advantages over adversaries.
When one "side" starts playing pretend with money (IE; using 50 billion in western currency on the Zumwalt class of destroyers before tossing them) the other side doesn't do the same, and stop taking advantage of PPP.
You’re the first one in this thread mentioning him.
https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/USS-Defiant-T...
In other words, yes it is billions pushed back into the economy, and yes, there will likely be very little "permanent" to show for it (and presumably the navy won't be much better for it) but it's not like they're just burying the cash.
It's important to understand that for the military industrial complex the goal is to "feed the machine", not actually to produce anything. In that sense this money is not wasted, it's doing exactly what it is supposed to do.
The battleship was clearly vulnerable to airpower in WWII. Much less so in WW1.
It’s an exaggeration saying that they were outdated in WW1, as they basically acted as a deterrent, but it was at enormous expense and they don’t do much. Too big, too slow, too expensive. The argument was playing out even prior to WW1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battleship
Aircraft carriers took over, as you say.
Also there were several battlecruiser/cruiser vs battlecruiser/cruiser actions.
Jutland was influential, but mainly just resulted in big ships doing nothing.
That is sort of the role nuclear weapons have too I guess?
That would be a battlecruiser, and they don't seem to have been regarded as a success.
Even the name is flawed.