Make sure that it's impossible for my online actions to be traced to my identity, and then I don't need privacy, because there is no association that needs to be hidden and protected.
Make sure that it's impossible for my online actions to be traced to my identity, and then I don't need privacy, because there is no association that needs to be hidden and protected.
Similarly, sometimes people say there's a tradeoff between security and privacy, which doesn't make sense since privacy (confidentiality) is one dimension of information security.
If you still disagree, could you attempt at defining privacy and anonymity and how you can prioritize meaningful anonymity without caring about privacy?
Food for thought: Rather than nitpick on people who apparently use the word in earnest in its actual meaning and thereby conceding that those policies are actually "taking your privacy seriously", rendering the word void of meaning, we educate and take it back?
Saying "Make sure that it's impossible for my online actions to be traced to my identity, and then I don't need privacy" is in a way giving up on privacy alltogether.
If you're planning to also be very careful about not revealing anything about yourself and your activities online, then that sounds less like "I don't need privacy" and more like "I guard my own privacy."
If that's what you mean, and you don't want people to misconstrue your intentions...maybe be clearer in your wording?