[flagged]
While I could sort of see some situation like you describe with a secret agenda from big tech, I think that probably requires significantly more cunning & organisation than they actually have around this stuff. It's not like Microsoft invented Rust - in fact it came from a relatively small corp in the first place.
The Halloween documents show that Microsoft is playing these games for a long time now. Who knows in which way they have advanced their psyops. Just because we can't read their E-mails anymore doesn't mean they stopped doing it.
Compared to C where it has the opinion of no fixed data types making you deal with it.
>Systemd was equally opinionated and also caused huge division. Who is paying the bills of Poettering these days: Microsoft.
Systemd was only opinionated in how it should break posix, because it's meant to be Linux only.
And you're then saying that there is credible evidence that Poettering was a Microsoft mole almost 15 years ago with instructions to create systemd to "disrupt" the Linux ecosystem?
Boy did Microsoft fail there, more distros than ever adopted it and it's these days almost entirely pain free.
>The Halloween documents show that Microsoft is playing these games for a long time now. Who knows in which way they have advanced their psyops. Just because we can't read their E-mails anymore doesn't mean they stopped doing it.
If you have actually read the docs you would know that their strategy is not to divide and conquer as they say FUD does not work, but to instead compete with OSS.
And I say this as someone who programs C/C++ on embedded. Just because C has a lot undefined bahvior doesn't mean it is unopinionated.
I found C way more approachable and rust filled to the brim with more rabbit holes and "logical-in-their-own-world/reality" way.. but again, I believe that's due to my own inexperience. Truthfully, in 10 years when rust fervor has died down and it has become more normal, I could see people vomitting at the thought that rust was pushed into the kernel, and there to be a strong push for not removing it but rather simplifying the code somehow? I'll definitely be writing another handful of projects in rust again in the next couple of years though, I liked how my last ones ended up
And not individuals who work at Microsoft does not count.
How in the world does this not count? People act in the interest of those who pay the bills.
Guilty by association?
So do you have evidence of Microsoft the company doing this or not?