> It seems like critical thinking, nuance, and just basic caution have been turned off like a light-switch for far too many people.
Ironically, this response contains no critical thinking or nuance.
Ironically, this response contains no critical thinking or nuance.
If you were pro-ai doing the majority of coding a year ago, you would have been optimistically in front of where the tech was actually capable.
If you are strongly against AI doing the majority of coding now, you are likely well behind what the current tech is capable of.
People who were pragmatic and knowledgeable anticipated this rise in capability.
You didn't engage at all on the substance of their comment - that they find AI useful for doing code reviews - and instead made a comment that was nothing but condescension.
All of that is separate from whether or not AI is overhyped or anything else - it being valuable for PRs could be true while it is also overhyped. If true, that could be some of the nuance you seem to be so concerned about us lacking.
2. True, I challenged the person's bias considering extraordinary historical comments lacking extraordinary evidence.
I never look at someone’s comment history. I judge them for what they said only and I disseminate that without getting personal. I made an exception for you given how you decided to stalk my comment history and I noticed you just do this for everyone.
And wth do you mean by "found out"? are you ok?
You need to calm down.
This was a fun dig actually. You doubling down made it even more so. Anyway, best of luck!