[flagged]
Certainly machine transcriptions are used these days for purposes that most intelligent people would judge to be perfectly reasonable.
That would be an unreasonably high standard and would set an incentive to withhold. Which is exactly the outcome we got here?
Wouldn't it be better to cheer the improved accessiblity? Then acknowledge shortcomings and ask for community contributions to improve things?
Why must perfect be the enemy of good?
Making things more accessible is a worthy goal, but the world is imperfect and making things better requires resources.