> Even if the conclusion is broadly correct, that doesn't mean the reasoning used to get there is consistent.
This is the conclusion of a reply that focused entirely on critiquing OP's style/AI use instead of their reasoning? Ironic.
This is the conclusion of a reply that focused entirely on critiquing OP's style/AI use instead of their reasoning? Ironic.
If I do, it just so happens I have a ten thousand word rebuttal for you…
If you want to argue that the reasoning in the essay is incorrect, I do expect you to refute the reasoning instead of merely attacking the source.