> If it was as great as its advocates say, surely it would have taken over the world by now.
That is a big assumption about the way popularity contests work.
That is a big assumption about the way popularity contests work.
The big assumption here is to think that a language can be so much superior and yet mostly ignored after half of century of existence.
I'm sure Lisp has its technical merits but language adoption criterion is multi-dimensional.
Thinking Lisp should be more popular disregarding many factors of language popularity is the true "Programmer who live in Flatland".