Hacker News Reader

Nope, a[b] is equivalent to *(a + b) regardless of a and b.

Given that, why don't we use just `*(a + b)` everywhere?

Wouldn't that be more verbose and less confusing? (genuinely asking)

Do you really think that `*(a + i)` is clearer than `a[i]`?

Not necessarily. I think it's confusing when there are two fairly close ways to express the same thing.