Hacker News Reader

Comment by codedokode | Hacker News Reader

How do they reliably detect fingerprinting? Did they solve the Halting Problem? Sounds fishy.

>The only efficient protection against fingerprinting is what Orion is doing — preventing any fingerprinter from running in the first place. Orion is the only browser on the market that comes with full first-party and third-party ad and tracking script blocking, built-in by default, making sure invasive fingerprinters never run on the page.

sounds like they block "known" fingerprinting scripts and call it a day.

This is also covered in the article. I appreciated the analogy they used: You can put on a ski mask when you go to the mall, and it will conceal your identity, but you will also be instantly suspicious to everyone around you, and will likely be asked to leave most of the stores you try to visit.

This is only because there are only 0.001% of people using anonymizers. If you are a minority with specific requirements, you are shown the door almost in any case, not only on the Internet.

> Orion is the only browser on the market that comes with full first-party and third-party ad and tracking script blocking

I love Kagi, but that is a laughable statement. Brave has been offering ad and fingerprint blocking for years now. The reason why they don't have full first party blocking ("aggressive" mode blocking) on by default is because it tends to break things.

This makes you inherently trackable, ironically. No trace is a massive trackable attribute, since almost nobody is untraceable.

Hey look it's that invisible guy again!

Reply on news.ycombinator.com