Require commercially used photos to not contain identifying information (face license plate) without consent of the owner (of the license plate/face).
This already happens a lot on Google street view.
This already happens a lot on Google street view.
So CNN can't put Trump's photo up unless he consents?
If I’m a photographer, do I have to get consent from both the divorced parents to photograph the kids? The kids themselves?
Okay? We're not on a legal forum drafting the 50 page law to cover all those loopholes. I'm nor even sure if the posting limit here would faciliate that.
I trust some decent lawyers can take the high level suggestions and dig into the minutae when it comes to real policy. And I find it a bit annoying to berate the community because they aren't acting as a lawyer (and no one here claims to be one AFAIK).
>If I’m a photographer, do I have to get consent from both the divorced parents to photograph the kids? The kids themselves?
Check your state laws. The answer will vary immensely. Another reason a global forum like this isn't the best place to talk about law.
Does a doctor have to get consent from both divorced parents to give a child routine care?
In public? Street photography style, you don't have to get any consent, generally.
Why is "both" the issue? You don't have to get the consent of both parents to photograph their kid whether together, married, separated or divorced.
The parent poster proposes changing that.
As an aside, these days I am guessing the latter is the truth in most states. So many specialty and personalized plate options out there that people are going to want to keep for themselves.
Obviously the government does own a small number of plates, of course, because they attach them to government owned vehicles.