I would say this does not work in any nontrivial way from what I've seen.
Even basic scripts and UI components are fucked up all the time.
Even basic scripts and UI components are fucked up all the time.
Literally every tool worth using in software engineering from the IDE to the debugger to the profiler takes practice and skill to use correctly.
Don’t confuse AI with AGI. Treat it like the tool it is.
The issue is really that LLMs are impossible to deterministically control, and no one has any real advice on how to deterministically get what you want from them.
The iPhone antenna issue was a design flaw. It’s not reasonable to tell people to hold a phone in a certain way. Most phones are built without a similar flaw.
LLMs are of course nondeterministic. That doesn’t mean they can’t be useful tools. And there isn’t a clear solution similar to how there was a clear solution to the iPhone problem.
You are technically correct: it was a design flaw.
But folks usually incorrectly trot it out as an example of a manufacturer who arrogantly blamed users for a major product flaw.
The reality is that that essentially nobody experienced this issue in real life. The problem disappeared as long as you used a cell phone case. Which is how 99.99% of people use their phones. To experience the issue in real life you had to use the phone "naked", hold it a certain way, and have slightly spotty reception to begin with.
So when people incorrectly trot this one out I can just ignore the rest of what they're saying...
Ironically AI models are iirc.
Come up with a real argument.
"no, you're wrong" is not a valid rebuttal lolol
That should be sufficient rebuttal.
This always feels like you're just holding it wrong and blaming the tool.