> The consistent pattern of bias against conservative figures demonstrated by Google’s AI systems is even more alarming. Conservative leaders, candidates, and commentators are disproportionately targeted by false or disparaging content.
That's a little rich given the current administration's relationship to the truth. The present power structure runs almost entirely on falsehoods and conspiracy theories.
I think plausiblibly they might, through no fault of Google, if only because scandals involving conservatives might be statistically more likely.
I don't think so, no.
> just an accurate description of party members as a whole?
It wouldn't be. While enough republicans have gotten caught being gay to remove the element of surprise and plausibly be the basis of LLM hallucinations, most of them haven't been, so such an LLM hallucination wouldn't actually be accurate, merely unsurprising.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Colbert_at_the_2006_Wh...
0: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...