[flagged]
Here is more info and links to the models, so you can interrogate them about Senatorial scandals on your hardware at home.
https://huggingface.co/blog/gemma
Your claim was so far from the truth of reality, that now, it's incumbent upon you to go back through the chain of faulty reasoning. You took it for granted that a conspiracy theory about suppressing information was true, when actually, the same Gemma model was already open-weighted by the same conspirators who you accuse of keeping Gemma out of regular peoples' reach
In legal terms, marketing such a product is called "negligence" or "libel".
Lots of software is flawed and unreliable but this is typically addressed in the terms of service. This may not be possible with AI because the "liability" can extend well beyond just the user.
From the Gemma 3 readme on huggingface: "Models generate responses based on information they learned from their training datasets, but they are not knowledge bases. They may generate incorrect or outdated factual statements."
So these vendors spent lots of time and money training LLMs to answer questions that people should not ask --- but are allowed and encouraged to.
Nonsensical and unrealistic. I expect the courts will agree and hold the vendors liable.
Then the tool should not be doing it --- but it does. And therein is the legal liability.
The knives are entering people’s guts. They should not be doing that. The knife companies should be liable for these stabbings.
The tool did it because this is what it was designed and trained to do --- at great expense and effort --- but somewahat less than successfully.
You can't have it both ways --- the tool can't be "intelligent" yet too stupid to understand it's own limitations.
If people ask the wrong questions, the "intelligent" response would be, "Sorry, I can't do that".
Maybe the problem here is that this "intelligent" tool is really as dumb as a rock. And it's only a matter of time until lawyers argue this point to a jury in court.