The "G" part of AGI implies it should be able to hit all the arbitrary yard sticks
"Most viable labor" involves getting things from one place to another, and that's not even the hard part of it.
In any case, any sane definition of general AI would entail things that people can generally do.
Like driving.
>That is stupid
That's just, like, your opinion, man.
I feel like everyone’s opinion on how self-driving is going is still rooted in 2018 or something and no one has updated.
I had anecdata that was data, and it said that full-self-driving is wishful thinking.
We cool now?
The world never ceases to surprise me with its stupidity.
Thanks for your contribution.
There's a difference between "I survived" and "I drive anywhere close to the quality of the average American" - a low bar and one that still is not met by Tesla FSD.
It's one skill almost everyone on the planet can learn exceptionally easily - which Waymo is on pace to master, but a generalized LLM by itself is still very far from.
As far as driving itself goes as a yardstick, I just don’t find it interesting because we literally have Waymo’s orbiting major cities and Teslas driving on the roads already right now.
If that’s the yardstick you want to use, go for it. It just doesn’t seem particularly smart to hang your hat on that one as your Final Boss.
It also doesn’t seem particularly useful for defining intelligence itself in an academic sort of way because even humans struggle to drive well in many scenarios.
But hey if that’s what you wanna use don’t let me stop you, sure, go for it. I have feeling you’ll need new goalposts relatively soon if you do, though.
Probable the biggest problem as others have stated is that we can’t really define intelligence more precisely than that it is something most humans have and all rocks don’t. So how could any definition for AGI be any more precise?
I said having to satisfy “all” the yard sticks is stupid, because one could conceive a truly infinite number of arbitrary yard sticks.
> Said one park ranger, “There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.”
[1] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/08/security_is_a...