I can invest lots of time in Linux, for example. I don't know how to write a driver for it, but I know I could learn how to do it. If there's a bug in a driver, there's nothing stopping me except my own will to learn. I can also do it in a potato, or my phone.
I can experiment with free tier LLMs, but that's as far as I will go. It's not just about me, that is as far as 99% of the developers will go.
So, it's not uninteresting because it's boring or something. It's uninteresting because it puts a price on learning. That horizon of "if there's a bug in it, I can fix it" is severely limited. That's a price most free software developers are not considering worthy. There's a lot of us.
I love learning about software. That's why I'm leaning so heavily on LLMs these days - they let me learn so much faster, and let me dig into whole new areas that previously I would never have considered experimenting with.
Just this week LLMs helped me figure out how to run Perl inside WebAssembly in a browser... and then how to compile 25-year-old C code to run in WebAssembly in the browser too. https://simonwillison.net/2025/Oct/22/sloccount-in-webassemb...
If I'd done this without LLMs I might have learned more of the underlying details... but realistically I wouldn't have done this at all, because my interest in Perl and C in WebAssembly is not strong enough to justify investing more than a few hours of effort.
A while back, I didn't even knew those problems existed. It took me a while to understand them and why they're interesting and lots of people spend time on them.
I have tried to adapt the problems to the LLMs as well, such as shaping the problem to look more like a thing that they're alreay trained on, but I soon realized the limitations of that approach.
I think in a couple of decades, maybe earlier, that kind of thing will be commonplace. People training their own stuff from scratch, on cheap hardware. It will unleash an even more rewarding learning experience for those willing to go the extra mile.
I think you're missing that perspective. That's fine, by the way. You're totally cool and probably helping lots of people with your work. I support it, it allows people to understand better where LLMs currently can help and where they cannot.
One of the reasons I am so excited about the "skills" concept from Anthropic is that it helps emphasize how the latest generation of LLMs really can pick up new capabilities if you get them to read a single, carefully constructed markdown file.
https://github.com/fosslinux/live-bootstrap/
Other efforts around the same problem are trying to make it more architecture independent or improve regenerations (re-building things like automake during the process).
It's free and open source, you're welcome to fork it and try your best with the aid of Claude. All you need is an x86 or x86-64 machine or qemu.
The project and other related repositories are already full of documentation in the markdown format and high quality commented code.
Here's a friendly primer on the problem:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu3laL5VYdM
If you decide to help, please ask the maintainers if AI use is allowed beforehand. I'm OK with it, they might not be.