Hacker News Reader

Say I prepare a contribution on my own that meets all guidelines and quality standards.

Then before submitting if I ask an LLM to review my code and it proposes a few changed lines that are more efficient. Should I then

- Leave my less efficient code unchanged?

- Try to rewrite what was suggested in a way that’s not too similar to what the LLM suggested?

"Users posting unreviewed LLM-generated content with the admission that they do not understand the code"

Unreviewed is a key word here.

That's not the policy:

Any contribution of any LLM-generated content will be rejected and result in an immediate ban for the contributor, without recourse.

No, unreviewed was the previous policy. Now it’s none at all.