> I'm guessing there was not any actual evidence to support even a prosection?

You don't have to guess, there was.

So much so that the special counsel that was shut down when Trump won re-election took the extraordinary step of declaring publicly that he had more than enough evidence to secure conviction of Donald Trump for Jan 6th.

https://www.npr.org/2025/01/14/g-s1-42358/trump-jack-smith-e...