If there's any evidence that you need to know who the proper stewards of Ruby's gems are, it's this.
If there's any evidence that you need to know who the proper stewards of Ruby's gems are, it's this.
First of all, it's criminal, and second of all, it absolutely lights a torch to any credibility they have. I expect people don't want to become unhireable.
I've had access/credentials to organizations that I've left and never abused them even once.
it would be quite easy to argue that ruby central had never had a right to remove these people at all
> I've had access/credentials to organizations that I've left and never abused them even once.
yes, likewise
and if I was Andre I wouldn't have even have ATTEMPTED to do this, as it looks terrible regardless of the eventual legal determination
Your post suggests conspiratorial thinking when there shouldn't be.