You mean memory-safe Rust is the default.
Taking this default is not enough to write safety-critical software… but it’s enough to write a browser (in theory) or some Android core daemons.
Taking this default is not enough to write safety-critical software… but it’s enough to write a browser (in theory) or some Android core daemons.
I can see how this would be confusing and probably should have been clarified with emphasis in the original comment. Safety in the sense of "safety critical" isn't a property any programming language can have on its own, so I wouldn't have intended that regardless.
[0] https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/meet-safe-and-unsafe.html